trakviewpoints project

TRAK SourceForge Projects

Definition

Implementation

TRAK Information

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

CVp-04 Concept Activity to Capability Mapping

This page reproduces part of the CVp-04 Concept Activity to Capability Mapping architecture viewpoint definition from the specification - TRAK00001. TRAK. Architecture Framework. Viewpoints. The page content is therefore subject to the same GNU Free Documentation License terms and conditions - see https://www.gnu.org/licenses/fdl-1.3.html

Most of the content is produced from a model of TRAK produced using a different set of architecture viewpoints!

Version

The TRAK CVp-04 Concept Activity to Capability Mapping architecture viewpoint is one of 24 architecture viewpoints defined in TRAK00001. TRAK. Architecture Framework. Viewpoints - current release is dated 10 July 2024.

CVp-04 Concept Activity to Capability Mapping Architecture Viewpoint Configuration
Perspective Viewpoint View ID Version Modified
Concept CVp-04 CV-04 8 2023-08-25

Summary

The TRAK CVp-04 Concept Activity to Capability Mapping architecture viewpoint defines the requirements for the TRAK CV-04 Concept Activity to Capability Mapping architecture view. This involves allowed content and minimum acceptable content ('well-formedness' criteria). The TRAK00001. TRAK. Architecture Framework. Viewpoints specification also defines consistency rules that apply to a set of architecture views (an Architecture Description).

The TRAK CVp-04 Concept Activity to Capability Mapping architecture viewpoint content is summarised under the following sections:

The TRAK Architecture Viewpoints specification provides are complete definition not only of the CVp-04 Concept Activity to Capability Mapping architecture viewpoint but considerations for the architecture description formed from a set of architecture views.

Something needs fixing?

Return to the Architecture Viewpoints list or Summary of Architecture Viewpoint Concerns.

Stakeholder Concerns

The stakeholder concerns addressed by the CVp-04 Concept Activity to Capability Mapping Architecture Viewpoint are : How / are concept activities sufficient to deliver capability?, . The stakeholders for the CVp-04 Concept Activity to Capability Mapping Architecture Viewpoint are :  Builder (of Enterprise),  Developer (of Concept),  Developer (of Enterprise),  Maintainer (of Enterprise),  Owner (of Concept),  Owner (of Enterprise), .

Stakeholder Concerns Addressed by the CVp-04 Concept Activity to Capability Mapping Architecture Viewpoint

The TRAK CVp-04 Concept Activity to Capability Mapping architecture viewpoint addresses the following concerns:

  • How / are concept activities sufficient to deliver capability?

Concerns addressed by all the TRAK architecture viewpoints.

Description

Describes how the concept activities relate to the enterprise capabilities needed. This enables the following problems to be identified:

Allowed Content

TRAK architecture view content is defined in terms of triples - Node - connector - Node e.g. 'Concept Activity supports Capability' that form short statements about the thing(s) being described.

Example of a 'Concept Activity supports Capability' subject triple for the CV-04 Concept Activity to Capability Mapping Architecture View

'Concept Activity supports Capability' is a Statement or Assertion in a CV-04 Architecture View

The rationale and theory for the allowed content of an architecture view is explained separately.

Subject Statements (Triples)

These are statements (triples) that describe the subject of the CV-04 Concept Activity to Capability Mapping architecture view. Specifically these statements address the concerns for this CVp-04 Concept Activity to Capability Mapping architecture viewpoint. These form the basis for the well-formedness section of the CVp-04 Concept Activity to Capability Mapping architecture viewpoint.

There are 5 possible subject statements in total which include 4 metamodel elements ( Capability , Concept Activity , Enterprise and Node ).

Return to the top of the Concept Activity to Capability Mapping page.

  • Capability depends on Capability
  • Concept Activity has part Concept Activity
  • Concept Activity supports Capability
  • Enterprise requires Capability
  • Node conducts Concept Activity

Return to the Architecture Viewpoints list or Summary of Architecture Viewpoint Concerns..

Optional Statements (Triples)

These optional statements (triples) for the CV-04 Concept Activity to Capability Mapping architecture view provide useful context with respect to a subject or universally allowed statements involving the subject or object (start or finish) elements in the Subject Statements (triples).

Universal statements may be added to any TRAK architecture view and describe typical concepts such as compliance or traceability:

Example of a 'Enterprise traces to Contract' optional triple for the CV-04 Concept Activity to Capability Mapping Architecture View

'Enterprise traces to Contract' - an optional statement or assertion for the CV-04 Architecture View

These statements address the concerns of their respective architecture viewpoint and will have been created first on these other architecture views.

There are 54 possible statements which may be used to augment the CV-04 Concept Activity to Capability Mapping architecture view, split into 6 groups:

Return to the top of the Concept Activity to Capability Mapping page.

Context

2 additional context statements:

  • Enterprise Goal requires Capability
  • Enterprise aspires to Enterprise Goal

Return to the top of the CV-04 optional statements (triples).

Universal - Applicable Requirements

12 additional context statements:

  • Contract governs Capability
  • Contract governs Concept Activity
  • Contract governs Enterprise
  • Contract governs Node
  • Requirement governs Capability
  • Requirement governs Concept Activity
  • Requirement governs Enterprise
  • Requirement governs Node
  • Standard governs Capability
  • Standard governs Concept Activity
  • Standard governs Enterprise
  • Standard governs Node

Return to the top of the CV-04 optional statements (triples).

Universal - Assurance

8 additional context statements:

  • Capability traces to Argument
  • Claim about Capability
  • Claim about Concept Activity
  • Claim about Enterprise
  • Claim about Node
  • Concept Activity traces to Argument
  • Enterprise traces to Argument
  • Node traces to Argument

Return to the top of the CV-04 optional statements (triples).

Universal - Concern Identified

4 additional context statements:

  • Concern about Capability
  • Concern about Concept Activity
  • Concern about Enterprise
  • Concern about Node

Return to the top of the CV-04 optional statements (triples).

Universal - Requirement Compliance

12 additional context statements:

  • Capability satisfies Contract
  • Capability satisfies Requirement
  • Capability satisfies Standard
  • Concept Activity satisfies Contract
  • Concept Activity satisfies Requirement
  • Concept Activity satisfies Standard
  • Enterprise satisfies Contract
  • Enterprise satisfies Requirement
  • Enterprise satisfies Standard
  • Node satisfies Contract
  • Node satisfies Requirement
  • Node satisfies Standard

Return to the top of the CV-04 optional statements (triples).

Universal - Traceability or Reference

16 additional context statements:

  • Capability traces to Contract
  • Capability traces to Document
  • Capability traces to Requirement
  • Capability traces to Standard
  • Concept Activity traces to Contract
  • Concept Activity traces to Document
  • Concept Activity traces to Requirement
  • Concept Activity traces to Standard
  • Enterprise traces to Contract
  • Enterprise traces to Document
  • Enterprise traces to Requirement
  • Enterprise traces to Standard
  • Node traces to Contract
  • Node traces to Document
  • Node traces to Requirement
  • Node traces to Standard

Return to the top of the CV-04 optional statements (triples).

Return to the Architecture Viewpoints list or Summary of Architecture Viewpoint Concerns..

Well-Formedness Criteria

This web site is a partial representation of the TRAK Architecture Viewpoints Specification

Well-formedness criteria define the minimum acceptable view content based on the subject statements (triples). These criteria are not included in this web page.

Please refer to the Well Formedness section within the CVp-04 Concept Activity to Capability Mapping architecture viewpoint definition in the TRAK00001. TRAK. Architecture Framework. Viewpoints specification (10 July 2024).

Presentation Methods

The CV-04 Concept Activity to Capability Mapping architecture view may use any of following means to the statements (triples):

Note that a textual presentation is acceptable for any TRAK architecture view.

Examples

Example of a CV-04 Concept Activity to Capability Mapping Architecture View - Example CV-04 Concept Activity to Capability Mappping Architecture View - PassengerFocus - Advocate and Campaign Capabilities

Example CV-04 Concept Activity to Capability Mappping Architecture View - PassengerFocus - Advocate and Campaign Capabilities

A UML example of a TRAK CV-04 Concept Activity to Capability Mappping architecture view. Describes the mapping from the advocate and campaign capabilities of PassengerFocus.

Produced using (Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect UML modelling tool in conjunction with the MDG for TRAK plugin (https://sf.net/p/mdgfortrak.)

Views Needed to Construct

This web site is a partial representation of the TRAK Architecture Viewpoints Specification

Since a triple originates in a particular architecture view if there is a subsequent architecture view that uses the same triple it need not be created. Similarly you might wish to create a triple but in order to do so the node element has first to be created in its originating architecture view.

For example, you cannot describe the functionality of an element without first defining the element having that functionality. A Concept Activity described using a CV-05 architecture view needs a Node described in a CV-01 architecture view. These dependencies between architecture views create a natural sequence or order in which architecture views are created by virtue of their content. These criteria are not yet included in this web page.

Please refer to the Views Needed in Order to Construct section within the CVp-04 Concept Activity to Capability Mapping architecture viewpoint definition in the TRAK00001. TRAK. Architecture Framework. Viewpoints specification (10 July 2024).

Consistency Rules

This web site is a partial representation of the TRAK Architecture Viewpoints Specification

Consistency rules define rules applied to keep the collection of architecture views consistent and also to keep the logic formed by the statements using triples consistent. These criteria are not included in this web page.

Please refer to the Consistency Rules section within the CVp-04 Concept Activity to Capability Mapping architecture viewpoint definition in the TRAK00001. TRAK. Architecture Framework. Viewpoints specification (10 July 2024).

Comments

The CV-04 is not the origin for any node elements. The CV-04 is the origin for 'Concept Activity supports Capability' tuple. The originating architecture views needed to construct the CV-04 are the EV-02 ('Enterprise requires Capability') and the CV-05 ('Node conducts Concept Activity').

Any unmapped Capability or Concept Activity elements should be identified as a concern using 'Concern about Capability' or 'Concern about Concept Activity' respectively.

Neighbouring Architecture Views

The CV-04 Concept Activity to Capability Mapping architecture view content may overlap that of the following neighbouring architecture views:

Spotted an error or want to suggest something - create a ticket

Return to the Architecture Viewpoints list or Summary of Architecture Viewpoint Concerns..

The TRAK architecture viewpoints are subject to the terms of open source license: GNU Free Documentation License (Version 1.3, November 2008) at https://www.gnu.org/licenses/fdl-1.3.html.

Modification Date: 2025-01-08

Eclectica Systems Ltd