TRAK Architecture ViewpointsSVp-06 Solution Competence
This page reproduces part of the SVp-06 Solution Competence architecture viewpoint definition from the specification - TRAK00001. TRAK. Architecture Framework. Viewpoints. The page content is therefore subject to the same GNU Free Documentation License terms and conditions - see https://www.gnu.org/licenses/fdl-1.3.html
Most of the content is produced from a model of TRAK produced using a different set of architecture viewpoints!
Version
The TRAK SVp-06 Solution Competence architecture viewpoint is one of 24 architecture viewpoints defined in TRAK00001. TRAK. Architecture Framework. Viewpoints - current release is dated 2024_07_10.
| Perspective | Viewpoint | View ID | Version | Modified |
| Solution | SVp-06 | SV-06 | 9 | 2023-08-25 |
Summary
The TRAK SVp-06 Solution Competence architecture viewpoint defines the requirements for the TRAK SV-06 Solution Competence architecture view. This involves allowed content and minimum acceptable content ('well-formedness' criteria). The TRAK00001. TRAK. Architecture Framework. Viewpoints specification also defines consistency rules that apply to a set of architecture views (an Architecture Description).
The TRAK SVp-06 Solution Competence architecture viewpoint content is summarised under the following sections:
- stakeholder concerns
- description
- allowed content
- well-formedness criteria
- presentation methods
- comments
The TRAK Architecture Viewpoints specification provides are complete definition not only of the SVp-06 Solution Competence architecture viewpoint but considerations for the architecture description formed from a set of architecture views.
Return to the Architecture Viewpoints list or Summary of Architecture Viewpoint Concerns.
Stakeholder Concerns
Stakeholder Concerns Addressed by the SVp-06 Solution Competence Architecture Viewpoint
The TRAK SVp-06 Solution Competence architecture viewpoint addresses the following concerns:
- Does the organisation or job through its role have the necessary competence to conduct the function?
- Is the competence consistent with the solution?
Description
Describes the competence needed for a role. Justified by linking to function or the extent of the resource to which the role applies.
Allowed Content
TRAK architecture view content is defined in terms of triples - Node - connector - Node e.g. 'Competence to conduct Function' that form short statements about the thing(s) being described.
'Competence to conduct Function' is a Statement or Assertion in a SV-06 Architecture View
The rationale for this is explained separately.
Subject Statements (Triples)
These are statements (triples) that describe the subject of the SV-06 Solution Competence architecture view. Specifically these statements address the concerns for this SVp-06 Solution Competence architecture viewpoint. These form the basis for the well-formedness section of the SVp-06 Solution Competence architecture viewpoint.
There are 4 possible subject statements in total which include 5 metamodel elements ( Competence , Function , Job , Organisation and Role ).
Return to the top of the Solution Competence page.
- Competence to conduct Function
- Job plays Role
- Organisation plays Role
- Role requires Competence
Return to the Architecture Viewpoints list or Summary of Architecture Viewpoint Concerns..
Optional Statements (Triples)
These optional statements (triples) for the SV-06 Solution Competence architecture view provide useful context with respect to a subject or universally allowed statements involving the subject or object (start or finish) elements in the Subject Statements (triples).
Universal statements may be added to any TRAK architecture view and describe typical concepts such as compliance or traceability:
- ... traces to Argument, Contract, Requirement, Document or Standard
- ... satisfies Contract, Requirement, Document or Standard
- Concern or Claim about ...
- Contract, Requirement, Document or Standard governs ...
'Job satisfies Standard' - an optional statement or assertion for the SV-06 Architecture View
These statements address the concerns of their respective architecture viewpoint and will have been created first on these other architecture views.
There are 76 possible statements which may be used to augment the SV-06 Solution Competence architecture view, split into 8 groups:
- Context - Function
- Context - Role Extent
- Context - Structural
- Universal - Applicable Requirements
- Universal - Assurance
- Universal - Concern Identified
- Universal - Requirement Compliance
- Universal - Traceability or Reference
Return to the top of the Solution Competence page.
Context - Function
1 additional context statements:
- Role performs Function
Return to the top of the SV-06 optional statements (triples).
Context - Role Extent
5 additional context statements:
- Role extends to Job
- Role extends to Organisation
- Role extends to Physical
- Role extends to Software
- Role extends to System
Return to the top of the SV-06 optional statements (triples).
Context - Structural
5 additional context statements:
- Organisation has part Job
- Organisation has part Organisation
- System is configured with Job
- System is configured with Organisation
- System is configured with Role
Return to the top of the SV-06 optional statements (triples).
Universal - Applicable Requirements
15 additional context statements:
- Contract governs Competence
- Contract governs Function
- Contract governs Job
- Contract governs Organisation
- Contract governs Role
- Requirement governs Competence
- Requirement governs Function
- Requirement governs Job
- Requirement governs Organisation
- Requirement governs Role
- Standard governs Competence
- Standard governs Function
- Standard governs Job
- Standard governs Organisation
- Standard governs Role
Return to the top of the SV-06 optional statements (triples).
Universal - Assurance
10 additional context statements:
- Claim about Competence
- Claim about Function
- Claim about Job
- Claim about Organisation
- Claim about Role
- Competence traces to Argument
- Function traces to Argument
- Job traces to Argument
- Organisation traces to Argument
- Role traces to Argument
Return to the top of the SV-06 optional statements (triples).
Universal - Concern Identified
5 additional context statements:
- Concern about Competence
- Concern about Function
- Concern about Job
- Concern about Organisation
- Concern about Role
Return to the top of the SV-06 optional statements (triples).
Universal - Requirement Compliance
15 additional context statements:
- Competence satisfies Contract
- Competence satisfies Requirement
- Competence satisfies Standard
- Function satisfies Contract
- Function satisfies Requirement
- Function satisfies Standard
- Job satisfies Contract
- Job satisfies Requirement
- Job satisfies Standard
- Organisation satisfies Contract
- Organisation satisfies Requirement
- Organisation satisfies Standard
- Role satisfies Contract
- Role satisfies Requirement
- Role satisfies Standard
Return to the top of the SV-06 optional statements (triples).
Universal - Traceability or Reference
20 additional context statements:
- Competence traces to Contract
- Competence traces to Document
- Competence traces to Requirement
- Competence traces to Standard
- Function traces to Contract
- Function traces to Document
- Function traces to Requirement
- Function traces to Standard
- Job traces to Contract
- Job traces to Document
- Job traces to Requirement
- Job traces to Standard
- Organisation traces to Contract
- Organisation traces to Document
- Organisation traces to Requirement
- Organisation traces to Standard
- Role traces to Contract
- Role traces to Document
- Role traces to Requirement
- Role traces to Standard
Return to the top of the SV-06 optional statements (triples).
Return to the Architecture Viewpoints list or Summary of Architecture Viewpoint Concerns..
Well-Formedness Criteria
Well-formedness criteria define the minimum acceptable view content based on the subject statements (triples). These criteria are not yet represented within the model of TRAK. Please refer to the SVp-06 Solution Competence definition within the TRAK00001. TRAK. Architecture Framework. Viewpoints specification.
Presentation Methods
The SV-06 Solution Competence architecture view may use any of following means to the statements (triples):
- block diagram (Organisation, Job, Role, Competence, Function = block, TRAK relationship = line with text label and direction indicator)
- table or matrix (row/column title = Job, Role, Competence, Function, Description)
Note that a textual presentation is acceptable for any TRAK architecture view.
Comments
The SV-06 Solution Competence architecture view is the master source (origin) on which you first create the following elements or statements:
Neighbouring Architecture Views
The SV-06 Solution Competence architecture view content may overlap that of the following neighbouring architecture views:
- CV-05 Concept Activity
- MV-01 Architecture Description Dictionary
- MV-02 Architecture Description Design Record
- MV-03 Requirements and Standards
- MV-04 Assurance
- SV-01 Solution Structure
- SV-04 Solution Function
Navigation & Website Tracker
Spotted an error or want to suggest something - create a ticket
Return to the Architecture Viewpoints list or Summary of Architecture Viewpoint Concerns..
The TRAK architecture viewpoints are subject to the terms of open source license: GNU Free Documentation License (Version 1.3, November 2008) at https://www.gnu.org/licenses/fdl-1.3.html.